Writers for Sale?

I really need to blog more. I used to do it weekly, then stopped when I realized it was interfering with the books I wanted to write. But lately, I’ve been finding that I want to say stuff, and rather than pick fights on social media with people I otherwise like very much, I thought blogging would be a good idea. Because what is a blog if not an unanswerable, inarguable assertion by someone who wants to talk smack, and not subject their arguments to analysis or criticism?

I’m only sort of kidding. These are the times we’re in. Battle lines are easily drawn and not so easily erased. There’s no, ‘let’s just agree to disagree’ these days. It’s more like ‘let’s fight to the death, preferably yours.’ So now you know why I’m blogging. Here’s what I want to say: this ghostwriter, plagiarism debate that’s been throwing the writing world into a tailspin lately is cray-cray. I mean, writers are out there using their keyboards as swords and are on a search-and-destroy mission to ferret out those who are not true to “the craft” either because they’re thieves or because they crank out hackneyed, formulaic stories and stuff e-books for profit, or they don’t write their own stuff but use ghosts who help them gain notoriety and a few more bucks.

It’s worth a moment to uncouple some of those things. The thieves are plagiarists. That’s a whole separate, unambiguously dishonest breed who deliberately steal the words or ideas of others and repackage them as their own. I think anyone who writes honestly is united with other writers in their condemnation of those folks.

And as for the scammers and book-stuffers; once a cottage industry, it’s now become big business for writers, and some non-writers to create very little new content and then pad their e-books with samples, teasers or previously released material, just to game Amazon’s system. Most writers decry this as well, and no one seriously argues that this practice should be allowed to continue though we may disagree about how much energy honest writers should give to that crusade.

What’s not as clear is where the writing world stands on the increased use of ghosts, people who do the writing for someone else who has maybe no will, acumen, or time to write their own stories. Ghosts are not a new phenomenon. And in point of fact, never used to be quite so ghostly. The most reputable folks who use ghosts say so, and put their ghost’s name right there on the cover, or in the credits or acknowledgments. Lately though, a new breed seems to be proliferating – let’s for the sake of distinguishing them, call them ‘ghouls.’ Ghouls are one-hundred percent invisible. We don’t know who they are because the named “author” does not even acknowledge their existence. This is where things have begun to get a little murky, ethically speaking.

Increasingly, writers who use neither ghosts nor ghouls are wondering whether it’s “fair” to the rest of us, and to the reader for them to be sold a bale of goods of dubious origin. Today, in the digital age, you don’t just sell books (electronic or otherwise). For good or ill, you sell yourself. The accessibility of the writer to today’s readership is unprecedented. We send and receive direct messages from readers, answer questions in real-time, and even form actual friendships with them in the real world. They are attracted to the written word, but often to the writer of it. Some writers are trendy, funny, hipsters, cool professionals, elusive introverts, boisterous extroverts, nervous strivers … and readers sometimes attach to them accordingly.

So, the question is, what if that persona to which a reader attaches is itself fiction? Is that ethical? Sounds like many writers are beginning to say not. It sounds like many in the writing community are growing increasingly uncomfortable with writers who may gain what they see as an unfair advantage by creating fake personas and selling that along with their books. Honestly, I don’t know what’s “fair” or not, and if writers are out there selling fake or amplified personas to move units, more power to you. I guess. I think it’s a broader cultural phenomenon. People do that every day on Instagram, even when they’re not selling a doggone thing except the illusion that they have a perfect life.

So, I’ll just talk about me and my deal. I write under a pseudonym. When I first started self-publishing, I was in a higher-profile job than I am now, and didn’t want my 9—5 profession to be affected by my writing life, or vice versa. I also like the anonymity. But I’m not completely anonymous. I don’t share personal pictures or details, but I do share almost everything else – embarrassing moments, stories about my day-job, my family, my neighbors and even, occasionally, the person I’m in a relationship with. I share it and it’s all true.

For me, the truth of it is important because here’s how I see it: when a writer’s words speak deeply to a reader, the reader feels kinship with them, and they feel understood. They feel it so much they write notes, emails, and send DMs, not as “fans” but as one human to another human saying ‘God, I didn’t think anyone felt this, saw this, understood this.’ And when you get one of those notes, it is hella-cool. It is, I kid you not, way cooler than when someone writes just to say, ‘You’re a very good writer.’ And for angsty, in-your-head types like writers often are, those notes also mean that not only did you understand them, they may understand something of you. I may not tell you where I live, but I do want what you know and understand of me to be real and true, just like I want the characters I write to be real and true.

Now, I know there’s going to be the “it’s just a business” crew and a “you-take-this-too-seriously” crew. Yeah. Both those things may be true. But I’m just here repping for the writers for whom it isn’t just a business, but a gift that allows us to see other people, and be seen by other people, and yet still hide behind the safety of our pen.

Love & Light,


4 thoughts on “Writers for Sale?

  1. I feel more strongly. Personally I consider writing a passion as well as a craft, and GIFT. It’s “part of business” but writing is my calling, my gift that God gave me to share with the world. Not everyone will get my writing, stories, viewpoints etc, but for those who do, as you said, there is a connection made! I’m an avid reader long before I published and soooo many books touched my life, some in light ways, some helped me learn (yes regular fiction books of all genres) and other spoke to me as a person and things that I was going through in my life. To ME as authors we always put a “bit” of ourselves IN our books, some times direct things that happened to us, other time things we’ve seen. Often things we WISH were real or WISHED it was how the world worked. To me writing is personal. So as that avid reader I have zero interest in reading anything by a ghost author UNDER a name of the author I THOUGHT I was buying. I’m old school, I hate this social media era of wanting to know your author. I have adored Nora Roberts and Stephen King since I was about 11(so over twenty years), I never once thought to write them, nor email them when email came around, or even look at their web site, (I could easily see on amazon when the next book was coming out). I didn’t need to know about their dog, work out routine, vacations etc. They could put all that in a book in some manner if they like. What I craved was THEIR imagination the stories they were telling me in paranormal romance, horror, and legal/crime stories (some of my other fav others) To (me) when an author uses a ghost writer and does not tell the customers that the story they are about to read is mostly or half or whatever NOT THEIR OWN, from their own brain and imagination. It’s fraud. Folks can dress it up how they like. A painter passing off anothers panters work as their own is fraud. A song writer, selling a song as their own when they took the lyrics from a friends poem is FRAUD. As a consumer I have the right to know what company(i.e. author I’m buying from) who made it, etc.

    I want to know their STORIES, their CRAFT that make me happy with. To me to much information breeds contempt.Eventually a person will have an opinion etc on something that I disagree or strongly disagree and now if we’ve mixed the author works with the person, I may not want to continuing reading your works if I know you “strongly” support X, that I strongly do not support. It’s a slippery slope. However To me ghost writing is cheating. It’s like your friend taking the ACT for you, but YOU get into college with that good score that you never would have gotten on your own. So to me authors making money (sometimes tons) because they are publishing 1 or 2 books a month WHO DID NOT WRITE THEM, and therefore getting more exposure, sells etc is a cheat. I know authors who do write that much themselves they ROCK! And deserve everything THEIR hard work gets them. Using a ghost writer(and NOT saying so, let me clarify that) is someone taking a short cut to win a marathon. Unless you are doing non-fiction books AND are high profile, OR physically unable to write (to me) there is zero reason to use a ghost writer. Writing is a “creative” job and just like with music, singing, painting etc you need to put in the work, hone and grow your craft to get better or rise to the top. If you don’t have the time, will, passion or creativity to write your own books, you don’t deserves the benefits of those that do. FYI I may use my response for my own blog down the road. No worries LOL no one reads it. But this is a real issue for me on both the reader and author side.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s